Glen Isle Developers
  - About Glen Isle
  - History
  - What is Smart Growth?
  - Economic Benefits
  - Cultural Benefits
  - Environmental Benefits
  - Impacts
  - Renderings & Site Plan
  - Press Related
  - About RexCorp-Glen Isle
  - Contact Us
Newsletter

Click here for latest press releases and news about the RexCorp-Glen Isle waterfront development.

 

 

 

   
  About Glen Isle  
 

Environmental Benefits

The environmental story of transforming a blighted, polluted waterfront into an active, vibrant mixed-use community will be one of the true success stories of the Glen Isle project—and an example of environmentally sensitive development that will serve as a model for developers and municipalities nationwide.

Glen Isle will result in the following environmental benefits:

Promotion of a cleaner and healthier environment with the removal of contaminated materials

Implementation of innovative storm water management controls for the entire area resulting in significant and profound positive effects on Glen Cove Creek and Hempstead Harbor
Re-use of storm water for irrigation purposes
Creation of new inter-tidal marshland, which acts as a natural filter, thereby further improving the creek’s water quality
State-of-the-art Green Building techniques to include:
Vegetated green-roofs
Use of recycled materials in building construction
Construction techniques that maximize energy efficiency while minimizing impacts on the natural environment.
Scenic views and natural vistas designed to preserve the natural beauty of the waterfront
Habitat creation, restoration and enhancement to include:
Improved mudflat habitat
Restored beach dune habitat
Creation and restoration of freshwater and inter-tidal wetlands
Inter-modal transportation options resulting in reduced air pollution and traffic impacts

In conclusion, what was once the epitome of blight and pollution, is about to become a remarkable community asset combining economic sustainability with environmental sensitivity.

 

Li Tungsten Superfund    Site, Explanation of    Significant Differences
   May 2005